Guillaume,

Sorry for taking so long to reply - I've been on a skiing vacation in
Norway and I'm just getting my nose above the water after having returned
to work.

It seems I must have done something wrong when I checked in my stuff then.
Like I've been writing in another mail conversation on this list I seem to
have done just about everything wrong so far.

Anyway, I was under the impression that even if the commit log looks a bit
awkward (with unnecessary merging and with the user "unknown") the commit
actually was performed.

Did I commit to the wrong branch? If you look at commit
7bb9a17e1f036148db97dd9c3d9308c40ea34e21 done on February 6, it should
include my two java files in the new package org.apache.log4j.filter in the
artifact pax-logging-service.

Now, if I browse the source code at your latest commit (
f49ff11ad0731e05ed336309b9ff0c493bc84dcb) done on February 27 I can see my
files there. How come they are not part of the release?

....

I think I'll answer my own question...Just noticed that you release from
the branch paxlogging-1.6.x and not from the master branch. I hadn't
realised that. I guess the correct procedure then is to commit changes to
both the master branch and the paxlogging-1.6.x branch - is that correct?

Should I add my changes to the 1.6.x branch?

/Bengt



2012/2/24 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>

> It doesn't seem to be in the branch where this release comes from:
>   https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/commits/paxlogging-1.6.x
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 16:40, Bengt Rodehav <be...@rodehav.com> wrote:
> > I have a feeling that PAXLOGGING-132 is also part of this release. I have
> > checked in the code a while back but was uncertain about the procedures
> for
> > changing the status. It is therefore still set to "unresolved". I guess I
> > should have done this - sorry about that.
> >
> > Shall I set it to resolved now?
> >
> > /Bengt
> >
> > 2012/2/24 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> The PaxLogging Team is pleased to announce the availability of a new
> >> bug fix release for the OPS4J PaxLogging framework!
> >>
> >> The 1.6.5 release of pax-logging contains a few bug fixes and
> >> dependency upgrades, including an upgrade to slf4j api 1.6.4
> >>
> >> For the full changelog head your browser to
> >>
> >>
> http://team.ops4j.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10021&version=11388
> .
> >>
> >> -Enjoy
> >>
> >> The PaxLogging Team
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> general mailing list
> >> general@lists.ops4j.org
> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > general mailing list
> > general@lists.ops4j.org
> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> FuseSource, Integration everywhere
> http://fusesource.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to