Hey Harald,

this sounds like a great Idea, especially since this is one of the
most painful thing in OSGi right now :)
So +1 for a Pax JDBC

regards, Achim

2012/6/13 Harald Wellmann <[email protected]>:
> These days, I had a chat with a friend and former co-worker of mine about
> the OSGi JDBC Service and the lack of progress and database support in
> Gemini DBAccess, which appears to be the only OSGi JDBC implementation
> currently available.
>
> After some thinking and hacking, I'm now proposing to create a new OPS4J
> project Pax JDBC to provide an alternative implementation of the OSGi JDBC
> service.
>
> Using Pax Swissbox Extender, Pax URL Wrap and Pax Exam, it was very easy to
> implement and test the first draft of a service implementation which creates
> a very basic DataSourceFactory for any old JDBC 4 driver.
>
> This stuff is ready to be pushed to GitHub after some cleanup.
>
> As always, any feedback, ideas or contributions are most welcome...
>
> Best regards,
> Harald
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to