2012/8/23 Andreas Pieber <[email protected]>:
>  All in all I
> don't consider it a good idea making CM required here.

Yes, would be better if you could make it optional or find a
completely different solution...

Just for curiosity's sake: Which particular protocal handler are you
trying to configure, and what is the use case for this configuration?

Best regards,
Harald

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to