Not really. Karaf uses my paxexam-Karaf which is basically configured with an entire distribution where your test bundle and exam is deployed to. If your devs are based on Karaf this might be the easiest solution anyhow.
Kind regards, Andreas On Sep 28, 2012 6:37 PM, "Andrei Pozolotin" <[email protected]> wrote: > also: karaf sort of solves this problem via karaf-features-plugin, right? > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: pax exam config duplication > From: Harald Wellmann <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > To: General OPS4J <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Date: Fri 28 Sep 2012 11:10:03 AM CDT > > This is an FAQ, and if it were easy, I guess we'd have implemented a > solution already ;-) > > You have to worry about transitive dependencies, API bundles vs. > implementation bundles (like org.osgi.core vs. > org.apache.felix.framework) and lots of other things. For every > scenario or proposal I've seen so far, it is easy to construct > counterexamples where the suggested approach would not work. > > I'm not saying it can't be done at all, but my feeling is it would be > a lot of effort to catch all sorts of weird cases, and I don't think > it would pay off. > > Another benefit of listing provisioned bundles explicitly is working > with different configurations in different tests of the same Maven > project, which would not be possible if the configuration were derived > from the POM. > > Best regards, > Harald > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing > [email protected]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
