Hi, on August 21st you did the following commit to the Tizen connman package:
https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=framework/connectivity/connman.git;a=commit;h=5ed7094e4994d03c7606f25881918565c81d1c24 the commit message was far from useful, but the content of the commit did, amongst adding Debian packaging (yay! I did not realize Tizen was migrating to Debian packaging, but an encouraging sign) -ver 1.3: - Fix issue with default configuration values. - Fix issue with timeserver canonical name entries. - Fix issue with crash from cellular dummy context. - Fix issue with incorrect index for private networks. +ver 0.78.4 + Apply BMC fix 24943 basically it looks like your commit downgrades the Tizen Connman version from 1.3 to version 0.78 Since 1.0 was the first version with a stable ABI, and many many bugfixes have happened since (including 1.0 -> 1.3, but also 1.3 -> 1.7), I am wondering why you decided to downgrade connman to version 0.78. Is there something wrong with the 1.3 (and 1.x in general) release of Connman ? I'm very curious about this, and was wondering if you can explain why you did this? (I'm working on another OS that uses Connman, and this makes me wonder if there is something wrong with the 1.x series, and if I should downgrade my version as well) Also, I cannot find your commit in the Tizen Gerrit review system; do you somehow have an exemption to not use Gerrit? (It almost looks like Gerrit is only used by Intel folks, and that the Samsung folks just outright bypass Gerrit) _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
