Thanks Hao,
But, I still need to know would Tizen 2.0 start up normally without SMACK. The compliance simply suggests SMACK should be used.
------- Original Message -------
Sender : Li, Hao H<[email protected]>
Date : 2013-04-03 17:45 (GMT+09:00)
Title : RE: [Tizen General] Is it mandatory to use SMACK in Tizen 2.0
In Tizen Compliance spec (mobile profile) - https://source.tizen.org/sites/default/files/page/tizen-2.0-compliance-specification-for-mobile-profile-v1.0.pdf
Page 26, it shows
The following are security requirements for Tizen platforms.
Smack based access control and process isolation
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Tizen General] Is it mandatory to use SMACK in Tizen 2.0
I've previously asked this question but could not get solution. I guess I have to rephrase my question.
(1) Should I enable SMACK in kernel configuration?
if Yes, /smack/load2 file could not be created, i.e., getting following error
apply_rules : No file or directory
if Not, I am getting following error and could
[/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/system-server-0.1.63/ss_sysnoti.c:243] ss_sysnoti_server_init: Socket SMACK labeling failed
[/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/system-server-0.1.63/ss_sysnoti.c:251] ss_sysnoti_server_init: Socket SMACK labeling failed
[/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/system-server-0.1.63/ss_sysnoti.c:278] socket create & listen ok
Please give some direction,
Thank you.
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
