On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Tomasz Olszak <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm opposed to this. >> >> >> 64bit support in Tizen is not yet mainstream at all, as a matter of >> fact it's barely been implemented in 3.0, and no major release that >> developers can use yet has happened. >> >> Can we maintain 32bit code until most developers have had a major >> release on 64bit? It will be a significant amount of time until that >> really happens. > > Hi, > I think that question concerns development tools (gbs, qemu and so on) not > the architecture of Tizen.
I was referring to this part that Zhang wrote: >> As Tizen will support 64bit build in the future, which can only be built by >> >> using 64bit system, so it's recommended to switch to 64bit system >> ASAP. My argument is that this motivation is somewhat premature - we want to use the tools on tizen itself (Zhang is not disputing that, nor am I) but the notion that 64bit support in Tizen itself is mature and everyone is using it (and gbs/mic on it) is obviously false. >From that follows that 64bit tools on Tizen could not have been extensively been tested. So why remove support for 32bit tools that are being tested and used right now if nobody is yet using and testing on 64bit? Sounds premature to me - the word "ASAP" certainly is. Auke _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
