I don't think it should stop 1.2.13. I think it is a question as to whether we should include the dll or not. But regardless, I don't think it should stop the release.
-Mark On 12/5/05, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about Jake' s note that the NTEvent appender is missing? > > I haven't had a moment to look at this build (Murphy's Law is > seriously getting a work out here at the moment), so I'm +0 if the > NTEvent issue is addressed. > > Paul > On 05/12/2005, at 11:04 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: > > > Hi, > > +1. Is this vote necessary? > > > > Yoav > > > > On 12/5/05, Nicko Cadell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Mark Womack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: 05 December 2005 03:23 > >>> To: Logging General > >>> Subject: [VOTE] log4j 1.2.13 official release > >>> > >>> The log4j project has chosen the 1.2.13rc2 version for > >>> official release. An official 1.2.13 version has been built > >>> and uploaded to: > >>> > >>> http://cvs.apache.org/builds/logging/log4j/log4j-1.2.13 > >>> > >>> This vote is for the LS PMC to bless this release as an > >>> official LS release. > >>> Please see the HISTORY.TXT for details of changes, if needed. > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> -Mark > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Yoav Shapira > > System Design and Management Fellow > > MIT Sloan School of Management > > Cambridge, MA, USA > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com > > > > > >
