On 23/02/2008, at 8:36 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
log4cxx 0.10.0 RC2 is now available for review for release on the
unofficial builds area. This release candidate is strictly provided
for consideration for release, may be withdrawn and will be removed
from the publication location at the conclusion of the voting
period. RC2 is currently available at:
http://people.apache.org/builds/logging/log4cxx/0.10.0/apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.tar.gz
MD5(apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.tar.gz)=
e50730742e18d3a72aa17ae1c2c673ce
http://people.apache.org/builds/logging/log4cxx/0.10.0/apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.zip
MD5(apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.zip)= f8b4f9855a2088aa14654885cd9535f0
md5's match ok.
The corresponding web content can be viewed directly from the
staging SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/trunk/docs/log4cxx/index.html
Site looks good.
The corresponding source is available at:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4cxx/tags/v0_10_0-
rc2
Link works ok.
Release will require at least 3 +1 votes from Logging Service PMC
members. However, votes from other parties and any feedback or
experiences with the release candidate are greatly desired. Given
the current makeup of the project, I would expect the PMC members
would verify the procedural and legal issues themselves (which is
their major responsibility on a release review) but would rely on
community feedback the content of the release. It would be helpful
if you would report any observations, particularly successes or
failures building from the release candidate (compiler vendor and
version, platform, etc) along with your +1, 0 or -1. PMC members
should identify their votes as binding. I'd expect that PMC members
would hold their votes until there is some feedback from the user
community. This will be a combined PMC and log4cxx-dev vote, a
separate PMC vote will not be called.
I've scanned the user mailing list and only seen one reply so far with
comments. I'm not sure I can validate the comment precisely to
understand the significance of it. I lean towards a +1 here, but will
sit and lurk a day or so longer.
cheers,
Paul