On 23/02/2008, at 8:36 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:

log4cxx 0.10.0 RC2 is now available for review for release on the unofficial builds area. This release candidate is strictly provided for consideration for release, may be withdrawn and will be removed from the publication location at the conclusion of the voting period. RC2 is currently available at:

http://people.apache.org/builds/logging/log4cxx/0.10.0/apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.tar.gz
MD5(apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.tar.gz)= e50730742e18d3a72aa17ae1c2c673ce

http://people.apache.org/builds/logging/log4cxx/0.10.0/apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.zip
MD5(apache-log4cxx-0.10.0-rc2.zip)= f8b4f9855a2088aa14654885cd9535f0


md5's match ok.

The corresponding web content can be viewed directly from the staging SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/trunk/docs/log4cxx/index.html

Site looks good.


The corresponding source is available at:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4cxx/tags/v0_10_0- rc2

Link works ok.


Release will require at least 3 +1 votes from Logging Service PMC members. However, votes from other parties and any feedback or experiences with the release candidate are greatly desired. Given the current makeup of the project, I would expect the PMC members would verify the procedural and legal issues themselves (which is their major responsibility on a release review) but would rely on community feedback the content of the release. It would be helpful if you would report any observations, particularly successes or failures building from the release candidate (compiler vendor and version, platform, etc) along with your +1, 0 or -1. PMC members should identify their votes as binding. I'd expect that PMC members would hold their votes until there is some feedback from the user community. This will be a combined PMC and log4cxx-dev vote, a separate PMC vote will not be called.


I've scanned the user mailing list and only seen one reply so far with comments. I'm not sure I can validate the comment precisely to understand the significance of it. I lean towards a +1 here, but will sit and lurk a day or so longer.

cheers,

Paul

Reply via email to