On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Scott Deboy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah I don't mind doing that work. One thing that was a slightly > significant change to the LoggingEvent implementation in log4j 1.2 - I > needed to be able to track expression matches, which impacted the API a bit > (find/colorizing expressions are displayed in the gutter on the right, time > deltas show up in the gutter on the left)..that allows me to render a > 'color' for an event without re-running the evaluation expression. > > I think that's an implementation detail and doesn't need to be in the > interface, but that's the one place in Chainsaw where the 'core' logging > event wasn't sufficient. > > To be honest, I've never used Chainsaw. However, my understanding is that Lillith (for Logback) is similar to it. I don't know how Lillith handles that but since it is a separate project from Logback I know that isn't included in the logging event, which makes me wonder how they are handling that - or if it does. Ralph
