On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-06-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Why would you want to hold it in a dormant state rather than move it > directly to the Attic? If people show up who want to contribute, > reviving it from the Attic shouldn't be more difficult than changing its > state from dormant to active. > > I'd not be against marking it as dormant if you feel Attic was going too > far. Good point. I was not aware the Attic would eat subcomponents of projects too rather than "complete projects". I am also fine with the attic. And it does make sense instead inventing another graveyard. > > Stefan -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
