lucene4c is a baby still. You should ask about CLucene on the CLucene list. Somebody just asked about that... maybe it was you :)
CLucene folks still seem to want to join Lucene at Apache. Otis --- John Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have looked at Lucene4C, it looks to me that it is in a very early > stage of devlopment. There are not any releases yet. > Does anyone have any idea when the first official release is going to > be out? > > Thanks, > John > > On 5/24/05, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John, > > > > There are a couple of other options beyond CLucene. There is also > > Lucene4C which is now being developed in the Apache Incubator > > (incubator.apache.org) and using a GCJ'd version of Lucene. The > Java > > version of Lucene has been integrated into PyLucene using the Java > -> > > GCJ -> SWIG. > > > > Erik > > > > On May 24, 2005, at 11:47 AM, John Paige wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I have heard good reviews about lucene, since we use C++ > interface, > > > I discarded the idea of using lucene. Recently, I came across > > > "clucene", lucene written in C++. > > > > > > clucene is not as well-supported as lucene, so I am not sure if I > > > should go for it. Does anyone has used clucene here? Any comments > on > > > effictiveness, support on clucene are highly appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > John > > > > > > > >
