OK, I have completed the software grant for Local Lucene. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387
At this point, there needs to be one or more volunteers to pick up
doing the work via patches on the issue.
-Grant
On Sep 2, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, the consensus seems to be to split into contrib modules for
Lucene Java and Lucene Solr. I just need to finish up the paperwork
over in incubation and then I think we can seek out volunteers on
the two lists to do the splitting in conjunction with the people
donating the code.
-Grant
On Aug 25, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: As to where, from the Solr point of view, a geosearch feature seems
: core, thus it should go in Solr core.
if i remember correctly,the LocalSolr has been designed/built as a
"plugin" so it doesn't actually need to live in the "core" Solr
code base
... it can be a Solr contrib ... but i agree it would probably
makethe
most sense for "Local Lucene" to be a Lucene-Java contrib and
"Local Solr"
to be a Solr contrib ... haveing a seperate "Geo" subproject might
make
sense from a code management standpoint, but not really from a
dependency/release management or user base standpoint ... either
people want to use
LocalLucene directly (in which case they don't care about the Solr
pieces)
or they care about using Local Solr (and don't know they care about
the
Lucene piece)
-Hoss
