On Mar 22, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Based on a quick look all the licensing stuff seems to be pretty much
in order. However, note the following:
* The copyright year in NOTICE.txt should be 2009, not 2007
* The main purpose of the NOTICE.txt file is to list the copyright
attributions other notes required by the licenses of external
software. For example, as required by the respective license, the
entry for the xpp3 package should include the copyright notice
"Copyright (c) 2002 Extreme! Lab, Indiana University" in addition to
the already existing part ("This product includes..."). Something like
the following should be fine:
This product includes software developed by the Indiana University
Extreme! Lab (http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/).
Copyright (c) 2002 Extreme! Lab, Indiana University.
I will fix these and generate a new candidate
Also, some notes about the release structure:
* The mahout-0.1-project packages contain the following entries not
included in svn:
Only in mahout-0.1/core: build
Only in mahout-0.1/core: input
Only in mahout-0.1/examples: input
Only in mahout-0.1/examples: output
Hmm, that's odd. I'll look into it. They can safely be ignored.
* Related to the above, see my comments on general@ and on nutch-dev@
about the nature of source releases. For me the source release is not
one release artefact among many, but the *source* of any other release
artefacts.
You mean about the size? I figured this is a 0.1 release, so we're
not going to put too much into packaging just yet. I picked the
easiest mvn target that produced something reasonable for people to use.
