I didn't include general@ only because I am a noob - copied now. I see a net +3, and if that doesn't change soon, we should consider it settled going forward. Apologies for belaboring this especially as I have only been on the list a few days.
On Apr 15, 2009 9:42 AM, "Jukka Zitting" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > In this new thread I simply... +0 I think the standard majority rule for procedural issues is good enough, but I'm just as fine with requiring a clearer majority. Especially as people seem to prefer that. PS. Why not have this vote on gene...@? BR, Jukka Zitting
