On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Michael Busch <busch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/3/10 4:41 PM, Mark Miller wrote: >> >> Agreed - a better description of what we are voting on should have been >> included. >> >> I'm only for the merge with aligned releases - its the only way Solr can >> really stay on Lucene trunk happily. Aligned releases are also my biggest >> worry (and part of why I initially leaned against such a merge), but without >> it, there goes all of the larger reasons I'm into the merge now - Solr can >> be on trunk and we can have better sharing / less duplication between the >> projects - which I personally think requires Solr being on Lucene trunk - or >> it won't really work at all. And Solr being on trunk really needs aligned >> releases > > So if it seems like that most people are concerned about releases (even > those you are generally in favor of this proposal), then maybe we should > discuss exactly this point. We haven't really discussed alternatives about > the release alignment. This vote feels rushed.
It's been discussed for a week, and I'm with Mark - I'm only for a real merge of development, and that includes release schedules. -Yonik
