Hi All, I'll preface my vote in this by mentioning I'm neither a Lucene(-java) or Solr committer, but I am -1 for this proposal is in its current form, per my comments referenced in the below URL during the existing discussions.
Cheers, Chris On 3/3/10 3:42 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <yo...@apache.org> wrote: > Many Lucene/Solr committers think that merging development would be a > benefit to both projects. > Separate downloads would remain (among other things), so end users > would not be impacted (except for higher quality products over time). > Since this is a change to Lucene/Solr project development, I'd like to > get a format vote from the committers of both projects. > If there are 3 +1s and more +1s than -1s, we can pass this to the > Lucene PMC to ratify. > > -Yonik > > Discussion thread: > http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c7817932400808ad/factor_out > _a_standalone_shared_analysis_package_for_nutch_solr_lucene > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
