+1 Bill
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only > that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't): > > * Merging the dev lists into a single list. > > * Merging committers. > > * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or > to Lucene), all tests must pass. > > * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may > release without Solr. > > * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break > out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their > contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers, > queries). > > These things would not change: > > * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored > into separate dirs/modules the way it is now. > > * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX > issues). > > * User's lists remain separate. > > * Web sites remain separate. > > * Release artifacts/jars remain separate. > > Mike >
