On 03/08/2010 09:32 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Yet the information we were voting on is public information really and this doesn't
really count as "sensitive" IMO.
Any thing I send to private@, I kind of count on not being public. I'd
rather you not decide that for me. In this case, I'm not terribly upset
that my private vote has gotten out - but again, I'd prefer that you
didn't make that call for me. I gave reasons for me vote, and you have
taken the liberty of taking my vote apart from them - I don't like that
either.
I'd venture to guess not all the PMC is subscribed to general@, and may miss
this vote, so it's important their votes be counted.
If you concerned about this, the best way to handle it is to send them a
note. Or send a followup to private@ with a reminder
that a vote is happening on gene...@. Get permission to take their
private votes public for them. Anything would be better than making our
private communications public - whether we decided the vote should have
been done in public or not.
Chris
On 3/8/10 6:23 PM, "Yonik Seeley"<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
<[email protected]> wrote:
For completeness from the VOTE on private@
It's called private for a reason.
-Yonik
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
