Here my vote: +1 for the latest proposal to merge the development.
I am still against the requirement that all changes in Lucene need all tests to pass in solr, but that can be discussed later. I would like to simply open an issue then, if a test does not pass and let the Solr people fix it (applies to all bugs in solr's tests). Also releases at the same time for both projects should not be coupled. Each project should be able to release when they think it's time. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:12 AM > To: general@lucene.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) > > Apoligies in advance for calling yet another vote, but I just wanted > to make sure this was official. > Mike's second VOTE thread could probably technically stand on it's own > (since it included PMC votes), but given that I said in my previous > VOTE thread that I was just polling Lucene/Solr committers and would > call a second PMC vote, that may have acted to suppress PMC votes on > Mike's thread also. > > Please vote for the proposal quoted below to merge lucene/solr > development. > Here's my +1 > > -Yonik > > Mike's call for a VOTE (amongst lucene/solr committers +11 to -1): > http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a400ffe62ae21aca/vot > e_merge_the_development_of_solr_lucene_take_2#22d7cd086d9c5cf0 > > Subject: Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) > > A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding > only > > that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't): > > > > * Merging the dev lists into a single list. > > > > * Merging committers. > > > > * When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr > or > > to Lucene), all tests must pass. > > > > * Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may > > release without Solr. > > > > * Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break > > out query parser, move all core queries & analyzers under their > > contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers, > > queries). > > > > These things would not change: > > > > * Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain > factored > > into separate dirs/modules the way it is now. > > > > * Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX > > issues). > > > > * User's lists remain separate. > > > > * Web sites remain separate. > > > > * Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
