This vote has passed. I will make the changes along with the other stuff I'm rolling out site-wise.
On Nov 10, 2010, at 10:39 AM, George Aroush wrote: > -1 > > I see the use of "Core" as too generic -- even when it's used like "Lucene > Core". In addition, it doesn't give you any clue that this is the "Java" > version. > > Also, isn't the full name suppose to be "Apache Lucene ..."? Shouldn't the > vote be on the full name? > > -- George > > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> Per the discuss thread and the fact that Java is TM Oracle, I would like us >> to change "Lucene Java" to now be referred to as Lucene Core. The primary >> change is on the website where the "Java" tab will now be the "Core" tab and >> other mentions will be adjusted accordingly. I still expect we will just >> refer to it informally as Lucene, since that is what it is. >> >> +1 >
