On Dec 16, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: > I think this sounds reasonable. Though I feel like you already sent > out the same notice before. > > +1 > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> The failure of any of the Lucene.NET committers to respond to status request >> for the Board Report this month doesn't exactly instill confidence in the >> life of this project. Additionally, it seems several projects have forked >> off over at Codeplex. I would appreciate hearing everyone's thoughts on >> where this project should go next. At this point, it's either the Attic or >> Incubator and I'm leaning toward Attic. However, I think it makes sense to >> give one more chance by saying: You have until January 31 to put together a >> proposal for going back to the Incubator. Please see >> http://incubator.apache.org for what such a proposal entails.
The last one was "you need to do these 4 things and say what you want to do going forward". This one is a bit more direct as in go to the Incubator or go to the Attic and fork. -Grant
