-1 for most of the same reasons everyone else is saying...
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org> wrote: > A single merged project works only when people are relatively on the same > page, > and when people feel it's mutually beneficial. Recent events make it > clear that that > is no longer the case. > > Improvements to Solr have been recently blocked and reverted on the > grounds that the new functionality was not immediately available to > non-Solr users. > This was obviously never part of the original idea (well actually - it was > considered but rejected as too onerous). But the past doesn't matter as > much as the present - about how people chose to act and interpret > things today. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272 > http://markmail.org/message/unrvjfudcbgqatsy > > Some people warned us against merging at the start, and I guess it > turns out they were right. > > I no longer feel it's in Solr's best interests to remain under the same > PMC as Lucene-Java, and I know some other committers who have said > they feel like Lucene got the short end of the stick. But rather than > arguing about who's right (maybe both?) since enough of us feel it's no longer > mutually beneficial, we should stop fighting and just go our separate > ways. > > Please VOTE to create a new Apache Solr TLP. > > Here's my +1 > > -Yonik >
