On Mar 30, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/PlanningArea
I have consolidated the Planning Area into 3 parts:
+ Chandler Project (cross-product, cross-project planning)
+ Chandler Desktop
+ Chander Hub, which is sub-divided into Chandler Server, Hosted
Service
To be consistent we should refer to the Chandler Server version
number as 0.7. Either that or we should be talking about Chandler
Desktop Preview version. Preview is just a label. I think we
ought to use the version numbers, because for the next Preview, we
might not all be at 0.7.
+ As for Standalone Chandler Server: We don't currently have
separate planning material/specs, but we've talked about doing that
going forward. We have a separate Standalone Chandler Server
section in the Product Area. We also have an Extending Chandler
Desktop section in the Product Area, don't know if that's
applicable to Planning as well: http://wiki.osafoundation.org/
Product/WebHome (Ted, Sheila, Priss, Cosmo folks? any thoughts?)
I don't understand why we have these two items (Standalone Chandler
Server and Extending Chandler Desktop). There's no difference
between the Chandler Server that we use for the Hub and the one that
people download. Also Extending Chandler Desktop isn't really a
product is it? It's just part of the Desktop.
+ I've also added quicklinks in the right-hand sidebar to PPD
Contributor Notes and Active Specs / Projects (e.g. Branding)
=====
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/NotesArea
+ I've taken a few choice links from the Journal WebHome: Events,
Mailing list stuff and IRC
The events page is totally out of date
The names of some mailing lists are unclear. We don't have list
named 'dev'. It's called 'chandler-dev'. Same for 'cosmo', it's
'cosmo-dev'
I think we should drop the IRC office hours pages. We don't really
have them any more, it's a vestigial reference.
+ And then I've split Contributor notes into Current and Alumnus
I think that we should canonicalize the way that there are
displayed. Everybody's first and last name ought to appear - how
will someone new know who "Randy" is?
+ The meetings notes that used to live in Journal will live under
Teams in the new taxonomy
+ I've also added quicklinks to the various TEAM pages in the right-
hand sidebar.
Is there anything else that should go in the Notes Area?
To recap the new Notes Area is meant to be a Sandbox area for
contributors...basically all the 'unofficial' stuff. The meeting
notes are actually kind of official...and also belong under Teams.
The top of the page says home of all things un-official. Does that
mean this is also a place for anyone to put up journal pages or is it
restricted to staff/interns/SoC folks?
*ATTENTION* Each of the Teams pages should link in the right-hand
sidebar to the Contributor Notes page of all team members. Please
side right-hand sidebar of the PPD Team page: http://
wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/DesignGroup
So is it time for me to start working on the Cosmo Team page? I
haven't done anything with it.
Sheila, we should clean up the Design Group page?
1. Rename it to be PPD instead of Design Group
2. We can probably get rid of all the planning and design links
(since I've got links in the right-hand sidebar now)...and just
have Meeting Notes?
3. Maybe we could expand on the People section? Describe each
person's role a bit more?
Mimi
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
