See my comments in-line…
On Apr 5, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
Questions: (Sheila, Ted, Priss, Jared and Katie you have special
questions at the bottom.)
Silence will be taken as: Looks great! Do whatever you think best.
1. Are people okay with having the team member list in the
RIGHTNAV? The idea here being that it gets that info out of the way
so that you don't have to scroll as far to get to meeting notes. If
so, please remove the People section in the body of your Team page.
(I believe Apps, Platform and QA are the only ones with People in
the body.)
Looks good.
+ If you have additional information that won't fit in the
RIGHTNAV, perhaps we should have an "Areas of Responsibility"
section in the body?
+ If you have more than just team members under people (e.g.
Interns, people who have left) those can be in a section near the
bottom? Not sure that stuff is important
If ppl think the area is getting too crowded, one could just link to
a separate a teams list page (to add ppl who have contributed or
left). It would also make the side bar less busy. I'm looking at the
server side bar, of course some teams like QA are small enough to
list out all the team members. One could also put the team members at
the bottom and put an anchor tag on the right side bar. It's really
up to the content owners.
2. Do we generally want to have Meeting Notes closer to the top?
Not necessarily for people on the team, but for community members
watching our progress or other OSAF staff who want to keep up-to-
date on what other teams are doing.
3. Should we agree on nomenclature? Old stuff, History = Archive?
Archive sounds good to me.
4. Also feel free now to edit the RIGHTNAV. I think the content has
stabilized enough.
5. Are we ready to move the Topic-Level Team pages into the Teams
Wiki area and rename them so that they match the page title? (e.g.
Working Group and Project becomes Team. Cosmo becomes Chandler
Server, etc.)
===
Sheila, if you're okay with the new PPD Team page, I can replace
the old Design Group page with this one. http://
wiki.osafoundation.org/Teams/PPDTeam
I realize this is really Sheila call, but there is just way too much
information on the right side bar for this page. I'm also not
familiar with what a 'Hub Server' is, perhaps just Server is fine if
you're currently linking to 0.7 release page.
My recommendation is to just keep to the high level pages and have
them link from there to the pages needed. Otherwise everything is
just getting lost—at least for me trying to access info on this page.
Also, I seem to have lost my left side nav on this page? It seems to
be located at the bottom of the wiki page.
---snip--
Priss, FYI, I have created a new OSAFSERVERSIDEBAR to replace the
old OSAFCOSMOSIDER. http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Journal/
OSAFServerSidebar
Ok. If you are going ahead and changing everything from 'Cosmo' to
'Server', then we probably want to change the titles in the quick
links as well. Or at least have Chandler Server (Cosmo) Blog—if we
are not going to revise the blog right away.
This conversation probably coincides with your request earlier to
remove the Cosmo name/logo entirely from the wiki.
I have created a new OSAFSAMPLESIDEBAR so that we can use it as a
RIGHTNAV example for instructions without it getting in the way of
any SERVERSIDEBAR pages. I can send out an updated version of her
instructions to the Wiki Gardeners.
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Journal/OSAFSampleSidebar
Priss, are you okay with that?
Ok. I think I'm confused. So where/when do we use this side bar? For
other pages which may need a side bar besides the high level
teams page? Or is this a suggestion for adding the includes to a
sidebar?
Oh, I also started to notice changes in the left nav. Could I request
for a 'glossary' under Coming Soon?
Looks good. =)
Thanks,-Priscilla
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
