[X] +1 for termination of WSRP4J

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Ate Douma <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Portals PMC and Portals community members,
>
> The WSRP4J incubator project has been dormant for several years already.
> The last commit dates back almost 2 years ago, the last emails send to the
> user/dev mailing list even longer than that.
>
> An important activity blocker for the Portals committers has been the
> unclear situation with the possible IP issue.
> That issue has finally been addressed sometime last year and no longer holds
> a lock on further progress for the project.
>
> However, although there is known interest in a proper WSRP implementation
> within Apache Portals, especially when integrated with the Jetspeed-2
> Portal, it looks like the WSRP4J project itself lost its momentum, its
> active committers and its community.
>
> The facts are: the current WSRP4J code base is now too outdated: based on
> also outdated Pluto 1.x and targeting the WSRP v1.0 spec while the WSRP v2.0
> spec is available already for almost 2 years now.
>
> If a proper WSRP implementation is wished for, it should now implement the
> v2.0 spec and should be easy to integrate with (at least) current Jetspeed-2
> Portal. Trying to revive the WSRP4J project or even just reusing the
> outdated code-base for that purpose no longer makes sense. More likely we'll
> start writing a new WSRP (v2.0) producer from scratch within the Jetspeed-2
> project itself, and a generic WSRP consumer portlet application at Portals
> Applications.
>
> As the Mentors of the WSRP4J project haven't been active in a long time
> either, the Portals PMC as Sponsor of WSRP4J has taken over their
> responsibilities.
>
> Therefore I'm asking the Portals PMC to VOTE for proposing the termination
> of the WSRP4J podling to the Incubator PMC.
>
> This Vote is open for the next 72 hours.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
>  [ ] +1 for termination of WSRP4J
>  [ ]  0 for Don't care
>  [ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (do provide solid arguments why)
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Ate Douma
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to