> I don't see why not; you can do a whole lot of fun with SVG these days > if you care to, or even Canvas. It might be a wee bit out of scope
no qualification, with a *tree* ;) On 12/22/06, Johan Sundström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > of course, you wouldn't be able to encode any qualification of the > > linking property ( like the strength of the relation using the > > thickness of the arc or proximity )... that, in my opinion, is the > > only justification to fall back into the "pathetic fallacy"[1]. > > I don't see why not; you can do a whole lot of fun with SVG these days > if you care to, or even Canvas. It might be a wee bit out of scope > going into heavy graph layouting problematics, but it's certainly > within reach if one sets one's mind to it. Have a peak here for some > appetizing interactive SVG pie chart visuals, for instance: > http://www.codedread.com/displayWebStats.php > > -- > / Johan Sundström, http://ecmanaut.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general > -- ::::: Aldo Bucchi ::::: mobile (56) 8 429 8300 _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
