Andrew Plotkin wrote: > We've been looking at various ways to improve Longwell's performance. This > starts with figuring out what the *current* performance is, so I have put > together a simple Longwell benchmarking tool. You run it from the command > line; it does a (configurable) list of queries against your Longwell > server, corresponding to the activity that would be generated by a user > adding and removing facets. For each user "command", you get a timing > measurement in milliseconds. > > This is a (nearly) end-to-end test. The timing info includes network time, > but not the time taken by the user's browser to download and display > individual item resources (such as images). > > https://simile.mit.edu/repository/longwell-bench/trunk > > See https://simile.mit.edu/repository/longwell-bench/trunk/README for > details of use.
Andrew, very nice! This gives me a way to understand the impact of Banach smooshing on the overall longwell performance. Also gives me a way to stress test longwell on the latest sesame API, perfect timing. Expect results here real soon. -- Stefano Mazzocchi Digital Libraries Research Group Research Scientist Massachusetts Institute of Technology E25-131, 77 Massachusetts Ave skype: stefanomazzocchi Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA email: stefanom at mit . edu ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
