Tim,

Although data visualization and browsing facilities are not the primary 
d'etre for Exhibit, they are some of the primary lures and baits that 
Exhibit uses to get more structured data on the Web. So, it's hard to 
separate data visualization and browsing from Exhibit.

Thank you for those links. Michael Friendly's work looks very 
sophisticated. I wonder how they can be offered in such a way that 
non-scientists can still benefit from them. Given a data set, it is not 
always obvious which visualization method to choose.

David


Tim Churches wrote:
> David Huynh wrote:
>   
>> The 2.0 branch also lets you place the facets individually on your page, 
>> rather than lump them all into one div, e.g.,
>>     
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/dfhuynh/projects/factbook/factbook-people.html
>> There are other views like scatter plots and pivot tables as well as 
>> numeric range facets (e.g., the population facet).
>>     
>
> I know that data visualistion facilities are not the primary raison
> d'etre for Exhibit, but they are a very important carrot to get people
> to use Exhibit on that long tail of semantically unorganised data out there.
>
> Most people in the sciences are fairly familiar with the usual visual
> displays for categorical or facetted data, but can I recommend Michael
> Friendly's Web site as a resource for some less familiar ways of
> visualising such information? See
> http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/friendly.html and also his visualisation
> gallery at http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/Gallery/
>
> Well worth an hour or so of browsing.
>
> Tim C
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>   

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to