Robert Parks wrote:
> Several days ago, David Huynh wrote a note about introducing children 
> to semantic markup.  I'm new to this list, but that's exactly why I'm 
> here!
Robert, welcome! :-)

> [snip]
>
> I am the author of the Wordsmyth Children's Dictionary-Thesaurus, 
> which has semantic relations marked for a significant set of terms.   
> i'd like to use Piggy Bank in developing an application to allow 
> children to collect both loosely related terms/tags (clusters) and 
> structured terms (concepts). These can be used in writing, search 
> enhancement, and concept-mapping.
Can you describe the user experience in more specific terms? Perhaps an 
end-to-end scenario would help clarify what you want.

> 1. One problem I'm having is that the RDF perspective links terms with 
> a URI/URL - so its primarily a metadata perspective.  When a child 
> tags a URL (or saves a document), the terms she uses can be linked via 
> there association with the URL. But as far as I can tell, the terms 
> aren't linked via their association in the mind of the child herself. 
> (Please forgive me if I'm mistaken. I'm still trying to figure out the 
> difference between Topic Maps and RDF.)
RDF is just a data model and I think it should be generic enough to 
model what you want. It might require more RDF statements than you 
think, and obviously the child should not be seeing the raw data as-is.

> 2. A second point of inquiry is about the use of semantic relations. 
> Our thesaurus is marked with relations like "part of", or "used by" or 
> "people associated with".  Piggy Bank seems to be oriented toward 
> collecting ("scrapping") data from web pages. But, if I'm 
> understanding correctly, the "microformats" for marking data on pages 
> isn't well developed.  Is there a possible use for our set of semantic 
> relations in specifying a microformat for semantic relations?
The Operator extension for Firefox can read microformats:
    http://labs.mozilla.com/2006/12/introducing-operator
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4106
and RDFa and eRDF can be considered the Semantic Web versions of 
microformats:
    http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-rdfa-primer/
    http://research.talis.com/2005/erdf/wiki/Main/RdfInHtml
(although Piggy Bank reads none of these three).

David

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to