Actually, with performance I meant both load time and interactivity, that for my exhibit is considerably slower than the world conflicts exhibit. It did help though, to remove two of the facets with many choices and few counts, so I will have to rethink the value of including these facets in the browse-panel.
It also appears that some of my questions will be answered by changing to 2.0, but I'll get back to you on that. So spreadsheet or JSON is not of major importance? /Vidar Den 14.06.2007 kl. 20:57:27 skrev General List <[email protected]>: > Vidar, > > The performance depends on a few things: > - how complicated the lens templates are - see if you can simplify them, > use CSS classes instead of style attributes. > - how many facets there are, and how many choices are in each facet - > avoid using facets whose choices have counts of only 1. > - how many items are shown - add ex:showAll="false" to your tile and > thumbnail views so that only 10 items are rendered at first. > - of course, the machine on which you're viewing the exhibit. > > And when you said performance, did you mean the load time or the > interactivity? > > Exhibit 2.0 (warning: not released yet) has been sped up a little bit, > might be noticeable if you have lots of facets. I personally haven't had > much problem with the map view being slow. How's this exhibit working > for you on your machine? > http://ryanlee.org/2007/04/conflicts.html > > David > > Vidar Falkenberg wrote: >>> I am building an exhibit with data from a Google spreadsheet. As the >>> amount of data and facets grows, it seems that performance is heading >>> towards unacceptable. Would there be a difference if I used JSON to >> store >>> the data? There are currently approx. 200 items with 25 properties, and >> I >>> think it will grow to maybe 300 items. The biggest problem is when I >> use >>> the map view, but that has perhaps nothing to do with spreadsheet vs. >> JSON? >>> >>> I also have some (or rather, a lot!) of other questions, but they'll >> have >>> to wait to my exhibit is ready to be, well, exhibited. I consider >>> switching to Exhibit 2.0 - are there any difference in performance >> between >>> 1.0 and 2.0? >>> >>> /Vidar >>> _______________________________________________ >>> General mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
