Jan Polowinski wrote: >>> Can anybody give a short comment on the use of facets:facets in >>> http://simile.mit.edu/2006/01/ontologies/fresnel-facets? > > Of course also the long answer was very appreciated. Thank you very much > for clarifying this! So putting a property into the list makes it a > facet. I don't know why I questioned that, of course that's the use of > the list. However then, the members of the list are not even restricted > to rdf:Propertys at all, are they? That's what I first had in mind you > wanted to do, but I think I can live without this restriction, cause the > application can care for this.
If there were to be any statements about an entry in the facet list being an rdf:Property, then any resource in the list would logically be an rdf:Property; OWL is not a schema in the sense that data can really be validated against it to find contradictory information. Is that rdfs:Class in the list? Infer it's also a property, /not/ that it doesn't belong in the list. Since this tiny ontology concerns declaring facets, that's all it provides for - :Facets. At any rate, the modelling's imperfect, due perhaps to the modeller (me), perhaps to the peculiarities of the model and language. Refinements are welcome. -- Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIT CSAIL Research Staff http://simile.mit.edu/ http://people.csail.mit.edu/ryanlee/ _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
