Brian Rossmajer wrote: > > I suspect I'm going to be asked to implement this in the next day or so. > > I'm happy to submit a patch as I assume others will want it too. > > > > I'm thinking of an ex:sortDirection attribute which could be "ascending" or > > "descending". Either way, the "missing this field" would continue to > > appear at the top if enabled. > > > > I'd love to know if anyone has any concerns about this! > > > > Thanks, > > Brian
I've implemented it, and ready to send the patch (should that go directly to you David, or to the list?) when I realized there's a conflict with sortMode="count" which sorts descending by default, where the default sortMode sorts ascending. Should I change the sortDirection semantic to "forward/reverse" or make ascending be the default for sortMode="count" or... ? Thanks! Brian _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
