David Huynh-2 wrote:
>
> Fruch wrote:
>> It's an impotent remark, didn't see coming... the @ operator isn't
>> referred
>> any ware, I'm seen it in the code, but the code isn't documented at all.
>> so
>> I didn't got what is @ for. (and I've found out about <> and form the
>> code
>> too, tried it first with !=, until I've found out that ! is for
>> traversing)
>>
>> but still my last question was not answer (don't get me the wrong way,
>> it's
>> sounds a bit pushy :))
>> summing with criteria is really why I've started this thread (and learn
>> some new things along the way:))
>>
> Presumably you want something like this (borrowing from XPath)
>
> !assignTo[.status == 'Done'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> But that's not supported yet. Right now you can do something like this
> instead
>
> add(foreach(!assignTo, if(.status == 'Done', [EMAIL PROTECTED], 0)))
>
> I haven't tested the .@ operator under that condition. Let me know if it
> doesn't work.
>
> David
>
>> I have load of other question, but I guess I'll put them in a separate
>> thread.
>>
>> thanks David, for preventing me from falling into a pit.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
worked like a charm (you use one extra '=' in there), I'll try adding those
to the wiki, those condition are really important.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-Sum-a-list-of-numbers-tp14356032p14367362.html
Sent from the SIMILE - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
