Thanks Ryan, this is helpful. On Jan 18, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Ryan Lee wrote:
> Mark Diggory wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I see Simile is now running Hudson, I've been using Continuum to CI >> for the DSpace community for about a year now. Can you comment on >> your choice of Hudson over Continuum, is there some features that >> "raise the bar"? > > There's a slight disconnect to our group experience as Stefano set up > our first Continuum CI and I did Hudson later, so I don't have the > direct experience of both. Stefano had his reasons for wanting to > move > past Continuum, but I don't recall what they are, though I believe we > stopped Continuum because the cost for any CI on our hardware > resources > at the time was too high. > > I speak mostly as an admin. Hudson is easy to set up. It works with > our SVN+MVN environment, and while Maven2 integration wasn't good when > we first installed it, getting a useful build is still fairly simple > to > accomplish. (I should go back and see if there's a better release > now). In continuum we have a problem where if maven "modules" are sibling projects (i.e. referenced via ../some-project/pom.xml) then continuum just can't handle it, each build is done in a numberically named directory and thus the reference can't be followed. I will look into if Hudson can manage this better. Again, thanks, I think I will try it out as a replacement for continuum. -Mark ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Systems Manager MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services Massachusetts Institute of Technology _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general
