Longwell Developers,

Well, the subjects a little "obscure" and I'm not sure I have the  
right terminology, but heres the question in more detail.

In DSpace we can have an Item with an Author name that is for the  
same person but has multiple variants....

> Hal Abelson
> H. Abelson
> Abelson, H.
> Abelson, Hal


The resulting import into Longwell would maintain each of these  
values separately. (excuse my poor n3 abilities)...

> <http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37585> <dc:contributor> "Hal Abelson"
> <http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38487> <dc:contributor> "H. Abelson"
> <http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38487> <dc:contributor> "Abelson, H."
> <http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37600> <dc:contributor> "Abelson,  
> Harold"


(And certainly they are each valid variants of Hal Abelson's name).   
I'm concerned that "some of us" out there perceive it to be Longwells  
current capability that by simply "adding" RDF statements that  
designate that these are equivalents, then Longwell will magically  
allow you to have these reduced to an "agreed upon" single value such  
that (I don't really know n3... I'm making this up as I go)...

> "Hal Abelson" <owl:SameAs> <xxxx>
> "H. Abelson" <owl:SameAs> <xxxx>
> "Abelson, H." <owl:SameAs> <xxxx>
> "Abelson, Harold" <owl:SameAs> <xxxx>


where

> <xxxx> <rdfs:label> "Harold Abelson"

And that by adding these sorts of statements to Longwell (or  
something "like" them), it will begin replacing those values with  
that "Label"? That maintaining such mappings in longwell will allow  
Longwell to magically clean our metadata and reduce duplicate values  
that occur in the facets.

I ask this because my interpretation of what you could do with  
Longwell was that you could develop a Sail for Sesame that was able  
to "filter" such equivalencies, but you had to know them "long  
before" you data was actually placed into longwell.  That basically  
your just "filtering" the data before it gets stored... Not very  
exciting... why not just do it before you sent longwell the rdf in  
the first place?

Any clarification on Longwell's "actual capabilities" in this area  
would seriously assist us in evaluating it a valid tool to base a  
discovery UI on for DSpace and reduce any misconception that I feel  
going on in our MIT Libraries group.  My concern is that Longwell is  
being perceived as a mechanism to "cleanup" presentation of Metadata,  
where I see its actual behavior to be more based on the old premise  
of "garbage in, garbage out".  My analysis needs to determine if our  
group is actually realistic in its expectations of Longwell's  
capability and correct those viewpoints if it is not actually the case.

thanks,
Mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
Massachusetts Institute of Technology





_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to