I checked the Xerces situation and it looks like they have one repository and yet multiple mailing lists. Does anyone know what they do? I'd prefer to keep it consistent and mirror their model.
Also, that was the whole point of having put a java/ dir under ws-axis/ for example.
Sanjiva.
There is a separate xerces-cvs mailing list, in addition to a -c-dev, -j-dev, -j-user, and -p-dev mailing list.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:24 PM Subject: create separate CVS? (was: Re: VOTE: move Axis/C++ to direct sub-project under WS PMC)
Hi Sam,
Where should the cvs commit messages for ws-axis be directed?
Good question.
It would be trivial (read: I volunteer to do it) to clone the ws-axis cvs tree and prune the java branch from one copy and the c branch from another. Both branches would retain their original version history.
What I would need to achive this would be a list of directories to retain/remove from each copy.
The commit messages would definitely be a problem .. directing that to the right list was a big part of creating new -dev lists. I assume there's no way to have commit messages to one part of a repository go to one address and the rest to another??
What do people think of the idea of creating a separate CVS too? The C++ version depends on the Java version for tooling, so that would definitely be a bit of a pain.
Sanjiva.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
