Dims asked me to follow-up on the discussion we had ref starting a new umbrella subproject to host other WS-* implementations. I'd like to call a vote for creating the WS-Fx project per
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?WebServicesProjectPages/CharterForWSFx
Assuming that this proposal applies to web services in the generic sense, how does this differ from the *-commons repositories used by other top level projects (the proposal mentions a ws-fx-sandbox)? If it doesn't, how about naming it consistently? If it is specific to Axis or web services in the "marketing" sense, can we distinguish this in the project name, and can you make this more prominent in the proposal?
...
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ReliableMessagingProposal
Dims wants to hold off on the WS-Security stuff until he has more discussion with RSA Security regarding IP/license issues.
I'm not especially comfortable with the level of diversity in the initial committer lists, and am currently -0 on both projects.
