+1 .. and Woden'ers you're welcome to take the charge on this! :). Sanjiva.
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 10:31 -0700, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Eventually sure...but we don't have folks working full time on this code yet. > > -- dims > > On 9/22/05, John Kaputin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has there been any thought yet on creating an API for ws-commons XmlSchema, > > separate from the implementation (e.g. as interfaces in separate packages). > > This would allow some other project's API to expose XmlSchema as an API, > > without being tied to the ws-commons implementation. > > > > This may not be an issue for most Apache WS projects, but Woden for example > > will define a WSDL 2.0 API and implementation separately to cater for users > > who may wish to re-implement bits themselves. For example, if we could > > expose XML schema through the Woden API using a ws-commons XmlSchema API, > > then when Eclipse uses Woden it may choose to provide its own EMF-based > > implementation of XmlSchema. > > > > I'm not expecting someone else to do all the work, just getting your > > feedback initially. > > > > John Kaputin > > IBM > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
