Hi,
It's clear to me from Tuscany's plans that there will be a WSIF-like API
for invoking SCA components, and since all kinds of endpoints can be
described using the SCA component model it will have WSIF like capabilities
(albeit in the context of a more complex runtime).
Once this capability is supported by a Tuscany release, I will support
deprecating WSIF and helping the WSIF user community transition to using
Tuscany.
Thanks,
Nirmal.
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Jeremy Boynes |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | rg> |
| | |
| | 01/10/2006 01:55 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | general |
|---------+---------------------------->
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [email protected]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: pruning projects @ ws
|
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Nirmal Mukhi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree that we should point WSIF users to Tuscany once it has subsumed
> WSIF's capabilities since it has a more active developer community;
however
> I am not sure what Tuscany's current capabilities are, can you point me
to
> a release and documentation?
>
> Thanks,
> Nirmal.
>
Tuscany has just entered incubation and has not done a release yet. We
just imported the code into svn and the documentation is currently at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/contrib/java/trunk/docs/
--
Jeremy
>
> |---------+---------------------------->
> | | Anthony Elder |
> | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> | | .com> |
> | | |
> | | 01/10/2006 04:59 |
> | | AM |
> | | Please respond to|
> | | general |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |
|
> | To: [email protected]
|
> | cc:
|
> | Subject: Re: pruning projects @ ws
|
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
>
> Apache Tuscany has some similar capabilities to WSIF. Maybe we should be
> encouraging new people to try that out, and document some sort of
migration
> path for existing WSIF users.
>
> It seems a bit unfair to new users not to warn them that WSIF has likely
> passed its sell-by date.
>
> ...ant
>
>
> Please respond to [email protected]
>
>
> To: [email protected]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: pruning projects @ ws
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +1 to continuing keeping WSIF while there is interest from users and some
> manpower available to maintain it.
>
> There still isn't anything else like WSIF available in the Apache WS
> portfolio, so I'd like to see it staying around.
>
> Nirmal.
>
>
> |---------+---------------------------->
> | | Aleksander |
> | | Slominski |
> | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
> | | .edu> |
> | | |
> | | 01/07/2006 08:39 |
> | | PM |
> | | Please respond to|
> | | general |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
> |
> |
> | To: [email protected]
> |
> | cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |
> | Subject: Re: pruning projects @ ws
> |
>
>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>
>>These are my thoughts...what do you all think? We are spreading our
>>efforts too thin and we need to seriously think about down-sizing a
>>bit and focusing our efforts. Feel free to start a separate thread for
>>a specific project(s) that you are interested in keeping alive.
>>
>>
>
> ...
>
>
>>WSIF : Last legs? Time to pull the plug?
>>
>>
>
> WSIF is currently in maintenance mode (fixing bugs etc.) and its future
> depends on users interests -there were several inquiries and ideas what
> to do but they did not go far (adding support for WSDL2 using Wooden and
> AXIS2 is probably the most probable to happen).
>
> if all goes well i will put a new (maintenance) release and update
> website (after i re-forest my mind) but ultimately WSIF future really
> depends on its users and developers - at least for now as long as there
> is an interest i would like to see to having WSIF actively maintained.
>
> thanks,
>
> alek
>
> --
> The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
