No objections from me.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Glen Daniels <g...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote: > Agreed that it's a boundary case, however if these guys (I'm assuming their > team is at least a few people?) are up for trying to revive the project, I'm > at least willing to entertain that notion. If they submit some serious code > (via patches at first) and are up to maintaining it, I'm personally OK with > doing some fast-tracking of the team as committers. > > Is everyone OK if we hold off the MUSE resolution until our next report, and > see what if anything develops here? So this month we'd submit the WSIF and > jUDDI resolutions. > > Thanks, > --Glen > > On 8/15/2010 12:26 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >> I'd consider this to be a boundary case. >> >> On one hand, it is of course in the interest of anyone to have the >> project alive, rather than retired. OTOH, while Jonas has contributed >> some bug reports (4), including patches and has voiced on the MUSE >> mailing lists from time to time (4 times, exluding this mail), that's >> not sufficient for me to say "no problem, just make him a committer" >> without hesitation. >> >> And, of course, he still has the option to continue on SourceForge or >> something like that. >> >> Jochen >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Jonas Buys <jonas_b...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am a Ph.D. student working at the university of Antwerp (Belgium) on >>> reliability improvement of XML-based web services. For our work, we are >>> using Apache MUSE which we host on top of Axis2 1.5.1. Some of our >>> students are also using MUSE for their master thesis. >>> >>> We are afraid to see the vote that is currently going on to retire MUSE to >>> the Apache Attic. By retiring the project, we fear that the consequences >>> such as a read-only JIRA section may impede further improvements of MUSE. >>> >>> For some time now, we have been maintaining an internal MUSE build in which >>> we have patched open issues/bugs as we encountered them and improved parts >>> of its implementation, like we recently did for MUSE's default WS-SG >>> implementation. Furthermore, apart from fixing occasional bugs and/or >>> limitations, we are currently finishing an RC-status implementation of the >>> MOWS specification. We would be willing to donate this code to the >>> foundation (after code cleanup and thorough testing). >>> >>> Has it already been decided MUSE is "fin-de-vie"? Or is there still a >>> chance to revive the project? >>> >>> We are looking forward to your reply. >>> >>> Sincerely Yours, >>> -- >>> Jonas Buys >>> --------------------------------------- >>> University of Antwerp >>> Dept. Mathematics and Computer Science >>> PATS Research Group >>> --------------------------------------- >>> Middelheimlaan 1, Bld G, Off G322 >>> B-2020 Antwerp >>> --------------------------------------- >>> (T) +32 472 365108 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
