Ok,
my apologies for not being quick and up to date on this.
So far I see 3 pmc +1's, one +0 and no -1';s. That seems like
enough to get this project going on. Unless someone in general
objects by Friday, we'll get started on creating an xml-security
project.
Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Canonical XML
>
> > So it could be interesting to use some package
> > namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> > like this.
>
> I would be very enthusiastic about a full xml-security project.
>
> -scott
>
>
>
>
>
> Christian Geuer-Pollmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ted
Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> siegen.de> cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], (bcc: Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus)
> Subject:
Re: Canonical XML
> 07/31/2001 02:15 PM
> Please respond to general
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> --On Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 11:07 -0700 Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > [I'm redirecting this again to general, since this is a proposal for a
> > code contribution and possibly a project creation]
> > I personally would be interested in seeing this happen. Your initial
> note
> > in general indicated that you thought that Xalan would be the best
place
>
> for
> > this.
> > I'd like to see some discussion of where the best home is for this
> > implementation.
> > Should this get folded into Xerces or Xalan or commons, or should we
> > create a new subproject
>
> Well, I'm not sure what's the best place for something like this. With
> "Canonical XML", "XML Signature" and "XML Encryption", we have three
> standards that are related to XML and Security/Cryptography. This means
> that they _use_ Xalan and Xerces, but the do not extend them. For
instance,
>
> my "Canonical XML" makes heavy use of the org.apache.xpath package, but it
> does not extend it... So it could be interesting to use some package
> namespace like org.apache.security or org.apache.xml.security for things
> like this.
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christian Geuer-Pollmann"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Canonical XML
> >
> >> I've written a complete implementation of Canonical XML [1] and I'm
> > working
> >> on an implementation of XML Signature [2]. My canonicalizer [3] is
based
> > on
> >> Apache Xerces and Xalan2, written in JAVA and performs all tests from
> the
> >> spec [1]. The software includes JUnit tests to ensure functionality and
> > has
> >> some small sample programs to see how it works.
> >>
> >> Is there any interest by the Apache XML Group to incorporate this
> >> software into e.g. an org.apache.security package?
> >>
> >> Would be nice to hear from you,
> >> Best regards, Christian
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
> >> [3] http://www.xmlsecurity.org/
> >>
> >> PS: I asked [EMAIL PROTECTED], but there was no response from the
> >> list....
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
