I believe the major advantage of using a static library is that run-time
dependencies are minimized.
Amit
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HELP: Making a static version of Xerces Library
I beleive every public method may have to be made as Static. But you may
have to
take care of instance variables ( as local variables to method).
Can you please explain what are advantages.
thanks
venu
-----Original Message-----
From: Amit Sahasrabudhe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 11:20 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: HELP: Making a static version of Xerces Library
At work, I'm asked to make a static version of the Xerces C++ Library as
opposed to a shared (i.e. dynamic) one. I can't find any documentation of
how to do this: If anyone knows how to do this, or where to look up the
documentation for this process, can you please let me know?
Thanks,
Amit
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
