Glenn Marcy wrote: > > Well, it doesn't seem too terrible at first glance. They have the > fix for XML-Commons defect #4129, but not for defect #4130.
I'm sure the SAX developers would be interested in bugs that are not fixed in the current release. > > Do you have a proposal w.r.t. the XMLReaderFactory comment: > > * <p><strong>Note to Distributions bundled with parsers:</strong> > * You should modify the implementation of the no-arguments > [snip] > > I am not trying to argue for or against these changes, but to raise some > awareness to the fact that changes to SAX need to be taken seriously. Sounds exactly like the type of issues that are discussed on the sax-devel and xml-dev lists. I'd suggest posting them there. -Edwin --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
