---- you Martin Stricker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ---- > Ummm, maybe I'm just too stupid, but why should all the projects keep a > copy of their xml-commons code if it already is in xml-commons? Please > enlighten me since I get the feeling that this approach obsoletes > xml-commons.
Well, it's obviously a choice up to the individual projects; this was just a suggestion to get started, and how Xalan plans to implement this currently. Yes, I recognize that this would be code duplication and a generally bad thing for maintenance, etc.; but I tend to be more careful with ease-of-use issues than most of the community seems to be. The copies checked into the individual projects are 'backup' files, for the case where a lazy developer who checks out only the xml-yourproject module wants to do a build. In the past, some folks have complained about having to checkout extra repositories to build their own project. If everyone can agree on having to checkout xml-commons before being able to build from their own checkedout module, then we don't need to bother with the extra copies. - Shane ===== <eof aka="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; quote="A mirror is like a window on the other side of behind you."/> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
