Ainsi parlait [EMAIL PROTECTED] : > ---- you Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ---- > > > If a 'full' xml api jar is provided, could we hope some consistent naming > > convention with the servlet api, which is currently provided into > > servlet.jar? > > > Something such as: > > xml.jar/servlet.jar > > xmlapi.jar/servletapi.jar > > xml-api.jar/servlet-api.jar > > Hmmm - I'm not quite sure what the connection is - who's servlet.jar are > you talking about - I'm presuming Sun's? Now that Tomcat is servlet specification reference implementation, it's more jakarta's jar than sun's jar. The connexion is: as they are both standard java extension api (javax hierarchy), having similar naming scheme would have been useful.
> Also, we already hashed out the naming issue here on general@xml, and at > this point it's really a deliverable from the xml-commons project so they > should be the 'owners' of the apache version of this. I don't remember the > difference between xmlapis.jar and xml-apis.jar, but I do remember that we > specifically avoided xml.jar since there are a number of old files named > 'xml.jar' that have outdated DOM, etc. versions and it's too much of a > headache to use the same name. thus the need to include version in jar names, the same as libraries do in real world (at least of unix world, of course). -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
