Martin Stricker wrote: > A repository of XML and XSL tools, maybe called "xml-tools", should be > kept separate from xml-commons. I see xml-commons as a > inter-xml.apache.org project, and a tool collection definitely would > target more on users than on xml.apache.org subprojects. And if > something from xml-tools becomes used by some xml.apache.org subprojects > it always can be moved over to xml-commons.
I agree with this. The reason we're using the xml-commons stuff is to be sure that our DOM, SAX, and JAXP classes/interfaces will interoperate smoothly with other projects. Anything beyond that may be something that we've duplicated or that we don't need, and should be kept part of a separate project... Though, it would be nice if some of those common utils could become part of an xml-tools project. -- Tom Bradford - http://www.tbradford.org Developer - Apache Xindice (formerly dbXML) Maintainer - jEdit-Syntax Java Editing Bean --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
