Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > 3) layout > --------- > > The layout previously proposed on this list was a solution to the speed > problem but I couldn't adapt it to the depth needs identified in the > rest of the goals. > > So, I resurrected my rusty web design skills and came up with the layout > you find attached. I've tested it on IE 5.5, NS 4.78 and Moz 0.9.5 on > win2k. > > Feedback, suggestions and criticisms are appreciated.
This is really great that you have taken this on Stefano, many thanks. We will all help where we can. I used "View source" to look behind-the-scenes and i see that there are still tables embedded within tables embedded within other tables. I think that this will again lead to troubles on some browsers with the larger documents. I realise that there may be a need to use one table to achieve the left-hand columns. However, i would like us to minimise the need for embedded tables, especially in the main text panel. --David Crossley --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
