Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Now, I wonder: is 'forrest' still the right name for the two things > combined?
I think of them as one thing, that's why I want them combined. If you look at the project descriptors, there are things in there that I always intended for future expansion, such as the locations of the home pages for the various projects. I know where I want to end up, and with your help (and John and perhaps others), we will end up there faster. I am neither possessive nor easily offended. If you want to use gump as the name for the combined effort, that would be fine with me. Or forrest if you prefer. Or some new name entirely is also OK with me. You pick. All I know or care about is what parts I want to work on next. ;-) - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
