Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On 05 Feb 2002, Theodore W. Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >> Do we need to include an extra LICENSE.crimson > > > > I think so. > > OK, it has been a bit more difficult than I thought as Crimson doesn't > have a LICENSE in its own distribution. Ant's CVS now includes an > explicit LICENSE.crimson and the next distribution will ship with it, > so that projects that import Ant completely (which is wrong IMHO), > will have it as well.
Fixed. I've added a LICENSE file to the xml-crimson repository and it will get added to the next crimson distribution. You can grab the LICENSE file at the tip of the xml-crimson repository if you want. BTW, the LICENSE file is just the first part of the header that is at the top of each src file in crimson (minus the RCS header info), since it looks like xml-xerces does it this way. -Edwin --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
